Former Arsenal striker Ian Wright has strongly criticized sections of the media for what he believes is unfair treatment of Jude Bellingham, following the England star’s visibly frustrated reaction during the national team’s 2-0 win over Albania.
Speaking on The Overlap’s Stick to Football, Wright argued that Bellingham’s passion and intensity on the pitch are being negatively framed in a way that would not apply to quieter Black players such as N’Golo Kanté. He said the contrasting reactions reflect a long-standing discomfort among sections of the press with outspoken and expressive Black footballers.
Wright suggested that the criticism of Bellingham who was labeled a “divisive soloist” in recent newspaper columns shows how narrative bias shapes public perception.
“There’s an unease when a young Black player shows emotion, confidence, or leadership,” Wright insisted, revealing that he had personally texted Bellingham to prepare him for increased scrutiny as his prominence rises.
The conversation drew support from fellow pundit Gary Neville, who noted that Raheem Sterling faced similar treatment earlier in his career, particularly in the build-up to major tournaments. Neville argued that the pattern has been visible for years, with media narratives often turning harsher when confident Black players step into the spotlight.
On social media, fans echoed Wright’s concerns. Many pointed to comparable examples involving other Black footballers who were criticized not for performance, but for demeanor and perceived attitude. However, critics pushed back, arguing that the backlash against Bellingham has less to do with race and more to do with sportsmanship and professionalism.
At just 22, Bellingham has quickly become one of England’s biggest stars, and Wright believes the heightened attention both positive and negative comes with the territory. Still, he stressed that the media must reflect on how coverage shapes public perception, especially when comparisons across players reveal inconsistent standards.
As England continue preparations ahead of the next round of international fixtures, the debate highlights ongoing questions about race, narrative framing, and the way passionate athletes are scrutinized in the public eye.